Rarely grown esculents
Of the tens of thousands of plants available our remote ancestors found a few they could not only eat but some they could actually grow for themselves. Even so in pre-Columbus England our range of crops was very limited. The most important basics for survival were grown in fields. Instead of vegetables in the gardens there would be quantities of culinary herbs, and more ‘herbal’ herbs, along with a few fruits of course.
Until recent times our ancestors ate much more fare gathered from the wild. They certainly ate many of our native and imported ‘weeds and wild flowers’ as potherbs, perhaps up to several hundred, more as a matter of necessity.
Amongst all of these a very few were destined to be selected and grown on as garden crops up until modern times. Indeed from the time of the Romans a millennium before there were still almost unchanged the same choices for pre-Columban Europeans. Cabbages, leeks, garlic and onions, beet and field beans and if you were rich melons, cucumbers, asparagus and globe artichokes. Then the Americas gave us French and runner beans, squashes, sweet corn, potatoes and a host of other interesting crops that had been developed by their peoples in isolation.
And in all parts of the world we ate countless wild fruits and ‘herbs’- many of which in Europe were pounded to a gloop for those with tooth complaints unable to eat. (Old accounts suggest much of the food had to be of a similar texture as gruel, stews and so on because of this common dental failing.) So many entries in books on diets and plants read “can be used as spinach” for any leaf that can be classed as edible fodder”.
A fascinating read is Sturtevant’s Edible Plants of the World. Ed. By Hedrick, published by Dover, this may be out of print so see libraries or second hand. It is worth the effort to find. Written a century ago Sturtevant searched the literature for references to the various plants we have survived eating and compiled them. Indeed survived on is just about what it is in places because along with detailed histories of the evolution of our everyday vegetables, herbs and fruits, it lists those others also once eaten more in desperation than for delectation. A very very few are now known to be potentially toxic such as rue and fern fronds but more than 99.9 % are safe to eat in moderation. Remember people in the past also had tougher digestions than us and that some plant bits need preparation first. Also it is often important as to which exact species and where it is grown. Bizarrely a form of Huckleberry I’ve grown from commercially offered seed is apparently in every way the same as one of our Nightshades, and the foliage of another very similar plant eaten as spinach in the Caribbean. So be extra careful of anything you are not 100% sure of. Also Beware entries sub-texted with something along the lines of “eaten by children and in times of famine”. From the days when everybody was hungry most of the time then for a plant to only ever be eaten by children and when actual famine gripped the land is not a high recommendation as to it’s palatability. I grew Kudzu, Pueraria, as it as an easy (fortunately not very hardy) climber with a scented flower, edible roots and edible foliage “that could be eaten like spinach”. I never got to the roots as the edible foliage took over the greenhouse and was indeed edible but not palatable to me, maybe to a rhino….
A Brussels sprout’s main stalk is edible but not very palatable. Many many things are eatable; that is they can just be chewed, swallowed, retained and may hopefully give more nutrition than actual poisoning. However the bulk are sadly not also palatable. That does not mean they should be ignored, no for they are the tasty crops of the future. With a little selection and cross breeding many edible crops could be developed which would be every bit as good if not better than those we already have.
Mind you us gardeners are such a conservative lot that the numbers seen of even the not so unusual are small. Why do we grow so few different crops? It is frequently we see the rows of the everyday but not very common to see rare crops offered in most of the catalogues if not in the racks at the garden centre. Why don’t more of us grow the useful long storing Kohl rabi and celeriac, the delicious carrot like salsify and scorzonera. The Hamburg parsley is I must admit not so useful and the foliage is too rank to use as parsley and the root too strong. But Pak choi or stir frying Chinese cabbage is also in every catalogue and it’s superb, yet rarely ever seen, except in ethnic plots. Believe me it’s so quick and can be used from small, cut and will grow again, even under unheated glass in winter. As healthy as cabbage and tastier. So why is it so rare?
I can understand that the growing for several years then blanching and forcing is too much trouble for Seakale to be popular but why not the quicker Chicory for chicons. And Swiss chard is as rarely seen and easier to grow than any spinach or seakale, and even crops through many winters given cloches. Those awful coloured forms are often stuck in ‘cottage’ gardens or as ‘ green’ tokens, but I don’t find them as good eating as the white.
Another plant that is so easy and so tasty yet rarely grown for food is the common Nasturium. The flowers and leaves are good in salads and the seeds are great pickled. With a similar biting taste and good with the pak-choi in stir fries are the young leaves and flower petals of Shungi-ku the Chinese edible chrysanthemum. This can be used for cut flowers too and is a good companion plant with brassicas making it a multi-purpose plant. I do find many of other Chinese mustard leaves too biting though they may be popular with some and do grow in winter. Better are the seedpods of ordinary radishes such as Cherry belle which are a piquant little snack when still small and succulent- these ought to be tried more often.